There could be specialized software to help with this, but there's no reason to get started on that now.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: dengorbachev on November 19, 2015, 07:50:48 AM
Imagine two Bitcoin networks are started simultaneously. Which one wins?
Quote from: dengorbachev on November 18, 2015, 03:48:54 PM
Pardon my ignorance, but what prevents a clever marketing guy from copying Truthcoin code and setting up his own prediction marketplace?
If nothing prevents it, does that mean that winning prediction marketplace will be decided by marketing rather than technology?
Quote from: zack on November 16, 2015, 07:20:33 PM
Hubs can self-impose rules that couldn't be imposed on miners.
It is possible to commit to promises in the channels. So if the hub breaks one of the self-imposed rules, then it loses all it's money in all the channels. All the rules can be wrapped in a merkle structure, so the proof that the hub broke a rule can be concise, even if the number of rules is very long.
Verifying proofs like this doesn't need turing completeness. Flying Fox's language is similar to bitcoin script.
Quote from: zack on November 12, 2015, 03:45:16 PM
The only solution to front running I like so far is to do a lightning bet through a hub. Some people have been incorrectly assuming that lightning bets use more liquidity than on-chain bets. This is not true.